Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement Surgery

1 6 this area of ongoing research is an example of how the medical field is continually evolving and trying to improve outcomes for patients.

Minimally invasive hip replacement surgery.

A primary difference between minimally invasive hip replacement surgery and traditional hip replacement surgery is the amount of skin muscle and other soft tissues that must be cut. American association of hip and knee surgeons minimally invasive and small incision joint replacement surgery. What surgeons should consider park ridge ill 2004. Traditional hip replacement surgery is done through an incision that is usually about 5 to 8 inches in length.

The surgery is performed with smaller incisions. The hope is that minimally invasive techniques will allow for an easier recovery in the short term and provide equal or better results in the long term. A minimally invasive total hip replacement uses a smaller cut incision than a traditional total hip replacement. Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery.

Beneath the incision the muscle is separated and the hip joint is exposed. The benefits of minimally invasive hip replacement have been reported to include less damage to soft tissues leading to a quicker less painful recovery and more rapid. Less trauma to the tissues results in less postoperative discomfort and. In the hip joint the rounded head of the thigh bone the femoral head moves smoothly inside the round socket of the hip bone.

It also uses special tools. Minimally invasive techniques are designed to reduce the tissue trauma associated with hip replacement. Minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is a general term that describes several variations of existing surgeries.